(BBC News) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the strike that killed scores of displaced Palestinians in Rafah on Sunday was a “tragic mishap”, amid growing international condemnation of the blast.
At least 45 people were killed, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. NGOs in Rafah say they treated hundreds more for severe burns, fractures, and shrapnel wounds.
Speaking in the Israeli parliament, Netanyahu said it was vital that Israel took “every precaution possible” to protect civilians caught up in the fighting in Gaza.
But he insisted that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) had used their “best efforts not to harm those uninvolved” in the conflict.
“In Rafah, we already evacuated about one million non-combatant residents, and despite our utmost effort not to harm non-combatants, something unfortunately went tragically wrong,” Netanyahu said.
“We are investigating the incident and will reach conclusions, because this is our policy.”
International organizations have lined up to condemn the strike, with the EU insisting that Israel respect a ruling by the International Court of Justice last week to halt strikes on Rafah.
The bloc’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, called Sunday’s strike “horrifying”.
Meanwhile UN human rights chief Volker Turk said the attack suggested that there had been “no apparent change in the methods and means of warfare used by Israel that have already led to so many civilian deaths.”
Israel launched the Rafah attack just hours after Hamas launched its first missile attack on Tel Aviv in several months.
IDF officials said that the attack had killed two senior Hamas commanders, and that it was investigating the deaths of civilians in the area.
But the Palestinian Red Crescent said Sunday’s airstrike targeted tents for displaced people near a UN facility in Tal al-Sultan, about 2 km northwest of the centre of Rafah.
Videos from the scene in the Tal al-Sultan area on Sunday night showed a large explosion and intense fires burning.
Graphic footage showed a number of structures ablaze next to a banner saying “Kuwaiti Peace Camp ‘1’, as well as first responders and bystanders carrying bodies.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said on Monday that one of its facilities had received at least 28 dead people following the strike, including women and children.
In a statement, the organization said it had treated another 180 wounded Palestinians, with most suffering from serious shrapnel wounds, fractures, burns, and other traumatic injuries.
MSF rejected Israeli claims that the strike was precise, saying the “attack on a populated camp in a so-called ‘safe zone’ in Rafah shows the complete disregard for the lives of civilians in Gaza.”
In a statement on Monday evening, the US called the images “heartbreaking”, but insisted that Israel had a right to defend itself.
“Israel has a right to go after Hamas, and we understand this strike killed two senior Hamas terrorists who are responsible for attacks against Israeli civilians,” a White House national security spokesperson said.
But they conceded that “Israel must take every precaution possible to protect civilians.”
Israeli officials had spent much of Monday scrambling to find out what went wrong in Rafah. How did a “precision strike” using specialized munitions with “reduced warheads” result in a firestorm that killed dozens and injured scores?
Following last week’s ruling by the International Court of Justice, ordering Israel to halt any operations in the Rafah area that might inflict further harm on the Palestinian population, Israel knows that the eyes of the world are on it. It is under enormous pressure to explain its actions.
It says the operation was based on intelligence, and it seems both Hamas figures were killed.
But the presence of huge numbers of civilians and, it seems, a significant quantity of flammable material, raises many questions about how this incident was planned and executed.
With top military officials, including Maj Gen Yifat Tomer Yerushalmi, the IDF’s advocate general, promising a thorough investigation, we can expect some kind of more detailed explanation to come soon.
But whether this marks a turning point in the campaign is another matter.
